|

If imitation
is the sincerest form of flattery, director John Carpenter must be the
most flattered filmmaker around.
Kurt Russell and Jamie
Lee Curtis want Carpenter to make sequels to their early hits. Twenty
years after the release of Carpenter's Halloween, studios
can't grind out Halloween knock-offs fast enough to meet
box office demand.
"I know that the producer
of The Thing went to Universal recently and pitched them
the idea of making The Thing II. But he said: 'Imagine it:
these teenagers arrive in Antarctica...'" Carpenter told fans at the Atlanta,
Ga., science fiction convention DragonCon on September 4.
The audience laughed
when Carpenter added he didn't think it was going to work. But the director's
tone was wry. In the 28 years since his student short, The Resurrection
of Bronco Billy, won an Academy Award, he's seen stranger cinematic
couplings.
Carpenter's own career
is no less unlikely. Although best known for the seminal slasher flick
Halloween and other horrors, Carpenter's credits range from
the TV biopic Elvis to the lush science fiction romance
Starman. Carpenter can neither read nor write music, yet
he composes and plays the scores to most of his movies.
Carpenter has streaks
of big screen homers, then strikes out repeatedly. Halloween,
starring the young Jamie Lee Curtis, earned $75 million on a budget of
$300,000. But Halloween III, in which a shadowy conspiracy
seeks to incite mass death through a mix of sorcery and TV advertising,
was in Carpenter's words, "financially, a terrible mistake."
In Carpenter's 1981
Escape from New York, leather-garbed Snake "I thought you
was dead" Plisskin (Russell) redefined swashbuckling for the post-apocalyptic
age as he journeyed through the penal colony of Manhattan. But audiences
and critics alike sloughed off the 1996 Carpenter/Russell sequel, Escape
from L.A., as another pointless remake of a "classic."
The phrase "pointless
remake" routinely finds its way into the first reviews of new Carpenter
movies, including films like The Thing, which later achieve "classic"
status. Popular and critical opinion of his work seesaws from film to
film, hour to hour.
Carpenter strives
to set himself above the furor. "I think every director goes through that,"
he said. "You're a genius for a while, then you're a bum for a while."
Real or reel, Carpenter's
attitude must be easier to sustain now that people are calling him a genius
again. His latest movie, Vampires, played to packed houses
in France for months. From the almost ear-splitting buzz on the Internet,
on public Web sites and private lists, the movie is a shot of distilled
darkness -- taut, gripping and infinitely seductive.
Carpenter calls the
movie, "Vlad the Impaler meets The Wild Bunch." Despite
its supernatural elements, the story would've made Wild Bunch
director Sam Peckinpah feel right at home. Vampires, based
on James Steakley's novel, explores some of Peckinpah's favorite themes:
hard-living heroes hellbent on revenge, and the hell that awaits them
at the end of their quest.
These themes obsess
Carpenter too. Carpenter loves westerns, and he emphasizes the classic
western elements in Steakley's tale. In Carpenter's hands, the Vampires'
New Mexico locales become more than scenery. The lovingly framed vistas
deliberately evoke the majestic West of director Howard Hawk's Red
River and She Wore a Yellow Ribbon.
The sere, unforgiving
beauty of the landscape also makes sense of the characters' casual cruelties.
Solitary mountains rear from the flat desert floor. Wind-blasted...
John
Carpenter (continued)
|